Police Brutality Essays

Crime: Police Brutality and Conclusion A. Police

An example of such a case was experienced In the police training program In Afghanistan were the clansman were brutally abused forcing them to seek the assistance of the Taliban group against the government. There are many reports on the police corruption conducted by commissions that are aiming at reducing the corruption of the police and ensuring justice to the civilians. B. Citizen complaints relative to ethnicity The police department has left a very bad impression in the minority communities especially as a result of brutal actions that the police patrols do to the civilians in such communities.

There are a number of complains that have come up regarding the manner in which peace keeping operations are carried out in some ethnic groups. Peacemaking should be the main role of the police department. However, this is not what takes place in the real sense In some communities. The levels of corruption In the police department have gone high and the civilians have to bribe them to be guaranteed security when the situation Is tense II. Body A. Police corruption 1. The crime that’s not going down Crime levels seem to be going down in majority of the areas.

In spite of this fact, the ritually of the police and the manner in which they handle the civilians is something that has brought a lot of concern to many people. Unfortunately, people tend to be very comfortable with this situation because many victims of police brutality find it hard to come out and express their grievances on the matter (King, 2010). However, police misconduct usually affects everyone, and it erodes the respect that the public has for the law and thus contributes to higher crime levels in the society.

In the Philadelphia case for Instance, it brought out clear the fact that there could be any people who go away freely with criminal activities because of the bribes that are given to the police officers.. 2. Increasing police corruption Many people easily Ink poverty with crime, but they do not look at the factors that might have led to such occurrences in the first place. Police corruption and crime are that they easily bribe the police officers or even involve them in the crime deeds. This is something that has become rampant in many states leading to more and more crimes.

In spite of this, people do nothing about the issue, while others claim that hey cannot interfere with the government operations. If this issue is not examined closely, the crime levels will increase as police officers still want to get more bribes and the people have made it an accepted thing in the society. 3. Police abuse cases in several parts of the United States Police corruption and abuse cases have become adamant in many states, something that is affecting the manner in which honest citizens perceive the police department.

Many people in Philadelphia for instance are accepting the claim that the crime levels will reduce hen police officers are reduced in the streets. The increasing presence of police officers in the streets is seen as a counterproductive act, as it has cultivated confrontations between the civilians and the police officers. Police misconduct in the state has resulted to the spending of over $20 million in settling of 225 civil cases that have been experienced in the last 2 years. In spite of the compensations made to the citizens, this does not restore the respect lost by those involved in the brutal incidents. . The U. S. Supreme Court on the court case this is the case of 2009 where he Supreme Court agreed that this had been against the sixth amendment right of confrontation for anyone who is under suspicion to be given a chemical drug test report and not having a testimony of the person who is carrying out the test. In spite of the ruling that such practices were not allowed by the constitution, it also rules out that the “notice-on-demand” statues were in line with the constitution.

The state was not in a position of violating the constitution by this statue by notifying the defendant that the prosecution was able to submit a test even though they didn’t have a estimation from the person who carried it out, as it will also give the defendant enough time to object the results. 2. Forensics examiners that violated the Sixth Amendment to the U. S. Constitution Because of the case, the court came up with a clean distinction between the confrontation and compulsory clauses.

Even though the sixth amendment ranted Enameled-Ditz got a permit to be able to call the forensic expert and have them as a witness. Instead, this would somehow reduce the trouble of having more witnesses on the side of the defendant as opposed to the prosecution side. However, it is a requirement that there should be testimony produced by the forensic experts who carry out the test on chemical substances in such cases. This right was however violated in the Enameled-Ditz. In spite of the appeals made by the prosecuted, the court out ruled it out and found Enameled-Ditz guilty.

The ruling out was a violation of the sixth amendment but the court never considered the appeal. C. Citizen Complaints against the police 1. African American civil rights groups There are a number of groups that are raising concern over the manner in which the Alice are handling the civilians. This has especially affected the minority communities which are affected most by the brutality of police officers and the corruption acts that the carry out. To counter this, there are a number of African American civil rights groups that are working on the cases involving police officers. Achieved if the cases involving the police officers are sorted out in a Just manner. Many police members have become drug dealers, gang bangers and even collar crimes, provided that it is an opportunity that presents more money to them. The civil sights groups are trying to curb such activities and redeem the police image to the general public. C. Controlling Police Officer Behavior in the Field The manner in which the police behave in the field has to be controlled; if at all the criminal levels that have resulted from the acts of the police officers will be reduced.

This will not be an easy task however, considering that the police are part of the government and civilians have some fear dealing with them. There are a number of ways in which the police behavior can be regulated effectively. 1. Using what we know to regulate police Many people contribute the rise in the crimes in the cities and communities without their know. Majority of them are however forced to do so by the situations that surround them.

For instance, those that makes part of the minority group’s end up giving bribes to the police officers to get some level of protection from them or nay other things that should not be given at a fee. If this was put to a stop, the level of police corruptions would be brought down. People should be taught their rights to protection and they thus deserve some protection levels without having to bribe the police. If such cases come up, there are many human rights groups where they can report the situation and get the protection that they need. . Initiated stops and prevent racially biased policing The civilians who give bribe to police officers should come to a stop because they should be serviced without issuing any sort of fee. If a person is abused by a police officer, they should come out and report. This is the only way that their rights will be preserved and the police will serve people as expected. Moreover, any person will information that a police officer is involved in any illegal activity should come forward ND report the manner.

Similar case applies to those who are neglected by the police because of the racial group or ethnicity (Brown, 1997). This is one method of initiating a stop to police corruption and abuse to the civilians. The crime levels will also reduce significantly if all these factors are considered and the corrupt officers eliminated. Ill. Conclusion A. Police corruption and citizen complaints relative to ethnicity Other than police brutality, police corruption is perceived to be a victimless crime since those that are effected are the entire community other than a single person.

Often, the attention will divert to the officers who made the mistake, without considering the kind of effect that the activity had on the neighborhood or the entire community. The corruption levels are high on the minority groups, meaning that the brutality of the police officers is felt more in such groups. To curb such occurrences, the police officers who break the law should be treated in a similar manner to the citizens who break the law. This is the only way of eradicating the police crimes and ensuring that the justice is done in all communities without bases on ethnicity.


Composition I short paper on Police Brutality

Police Brutality Most of us have seen the videotape of police officers savagely beating Rodney King. But how typical was this behavior? The Rodney King incident is not representative of most police officers around the country. Television shows, newscasts, and written media exacerbate the problem when they do not focus on the criminal as the root of the problem. “[C]rent Images of the police are drawn largely from television programs bearing little resemblance to reality” (Delegate 29). Police brutality Is a matter of serious concern, but it is not as prevalent as the media would have us live.

Police brutality is not a national crisis. Rodney King has become synonymous with police brutality. But what is police brutality? Bernstein states that “[p]Alice brutality Is the use of excessive force by police officers” (39). Most police are trained to use only the minimum amount of force necessary to control a given situation. The decision to use force Is often made on a split second basis usually under difficult circumstances. The boundaries between justified and excessive force can sometimes be blurred under these circumstances.

Under one set of circumstances, a particular action might be considered justified, but under differing circumstances, the same action might be considered brutality. Most cops do not like to hurt people; “… Cops sometimes use unnecessary force. They also use extraordinary restraint” (Sulk 80). Many police officers feel anguish after using fully justified force; few take pleasure in it. There are great strains on individual police officers: competing responsibilities, values, temptations, fears, and expectations.

Police officers are called on to be patient mediators, skilled therapists, effective admonisher, daring crime fighters, obedient members of paramilitary agencies, etc. In the midst of these requirements Is the violence Inherent In police work. Police officers often witness women battered by husbands and boyfriends, children burned and broken by parents, pedestrians maimed by drunk drivers, teachers raped by students, and innocent strangers savaged by predators in our streets. Even so, most police do not have a bunker mentality. They go on the force knowing what they will have to encounter.

They Like their Jobs and are ready and able to stand the erasure–usually. Some police adjust poorly to the pressures of police work. They become cynical from the danger, the perceived failure of the system, and the repetitiveness of their work. Some police officers despair over the violence, suffering, hopelessness, and ignorance they encounter every day. Even so, the majority of police officers continue the performance of their duties without resorting to brutality. In spite of the seriousness of the publicized incidents, far more serious than police According to the U. S. Department of Justice’s Police Use of Force, 44. Million people, r 21% of the population had face to face contact with police during 1996. Police contacts that resulted in the use of force or the threat of force totaled only five hundred thousand, or one percent of the total. Often times the use of force was preceded by some provocative action. Criminals often threaten the officer, assault the officer, argue or interfere with an arrest, posses a weapon, try to escape, elude, or resist arrest. After accounting for Justified use of force, which is inherent in police work, less than one quarter of one percent of police contacts resulted in questionable SE of force.

This is hardly an epidemic. “Given the small number of cases, a preliminary conclusion that could be drawn is that use of force is rare in police- citizen contacts and it is often accompanied… By some possibly provocative behavior” (Police 14). On the flip side, if the media cares to report the flip side, 46,695 police officers were assaulted in 1996 (United States 65), resulting in 14,985 injuries and 55 deaths (United States 3). The statistics show that police officers are brutalized three thousand seven hundred and sixty times more frequently than criminals are.

Americans are well served with professional dedication and with frequent instances of physical courage. The people who stand between violence and the public are the police. Sometimes criminals do not want to cooperate, but police are still expected to arrest them. Most police officers abhor violence and despise fellow officers who use excessive force. Police brutality is not the epidemic we are led to believe it is. Let police do their Job, if they violate the law, prosecute them as individuals without condemning every police officer in the country. Works Cited Bernstein, Jerry.


Police brutality

Some police are becoming more dangerous because they are often violent toward people, some are becoming criminals themselves, and some are abusing the power of their position. Some police are becoming more dangerous because they are often violent and aggressive towards people. One of the reasons is they are becoming more militaries in their training and mind set. A candidate for the Washington 8th congressional district said ” beat cops have been replaced by special ops. This tells us all that the government is trying to militaries our police officers to deal with situations as If they were in a war. I think this Is becoming a huge problem because now the police are being taught to shoot first to protect themselves then ask questions. There was a circumstance where a little boy and his friends where playing in the street with toy aircrafts guns. The boys were playing and a cop happen to drive by them during his patrol. The police officer then proceeded to get out of his vehicle and hide behind behind the door.

While behind his door he yelled to the kids to put down the guns and get on the ground. One of the kids quickly turned towards him and the cop fired his weapon. The cop did not even ask any questions and did not even estimate to shoot. It was later discover that the aircrafts gun had a orange tip on the end of the barrel. This is a requirement for B guns and aircrafts guns. It allows people to realize that they are fake guns. The cop said he did not even see the orange he Just saw what looked like a real gun a feared for his life.

He was later suspended for a month with pay. This example showed how some cops are becoming more militaries and defensive. This should not happen In our local law enforcement. They are here to protect us and serve as a garden not as a special ops agent. Another thing that they would not be allowed to do is be suspended. If someone outside the police force did this they would be put in Jail and possibly put in prison with a murder charge. Some of these cop are just getting a slap on the wrist and told to stay home for a month to clear there head, while getting paid.

Some police are becoming more dangerous because they are often violent and aggressive towards people. Another one of these reasons Is they will take a calm situation and turn it Into a Intense and horrible situation by beating or harming person they are trying to detain. Some of this has to do with people refusing to operate and fighting back, but some of are Just getting harassed and being forced to be handcuffed and arrested. Some are even arrested and beaten from telling an officer he has constitutional rights that are being violated and the cop just continues to push his way.

In one case there was a African American family that got pulled over by two cops because the wife who was driving was not wearing a settable. Normally the cops would Just write the driver a ticket and send them on there way. In this circumstance the wife asked her husband to get the papers that the cop asked for and the cop lulled a gun on the family. The father then told the police it was the paper and the cop asked them to get out of the car. With no reason to get out of the car the family refused.

After the cops told the family to exit the vehicle a few Noreen times one of the through the other cop dazed the dad and pulled him out of the car and proceeded to rarest him. After they got him up and handcuffed they started leading his to the police car with the taker still in is back. The father started to wiggle and yell at the officer because he dazed him in front of his three kids in the back seat, and the cop gazed him again and held it for quite awhile.

After they got him in the car they proceeded to get in the car and arrest the wife leaving the kids in the car. This shows that cops take situations way out of hand if they are given a little attitude and are not getting what they want. In the news letter a reporter said “that the cops had no reason to ask them to get out of there car and they took thing way to far. ” By telling them to exit the car and then forcing them to is violating our right as an American citizen, and should not be taking lightly by the courts.


Freedom To peacefully Assemble

The first amendment states “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.” (4) Freedom to peacefully assemble allows the public to protest in what they believe in. Protests happen all the time throughout our country on all different issues. Should protest not be allowed to take place on public property without a permit? Continue Reading…


Police Corruption Can be Minimized but Never Eradicated

Police corruption is a problem that can be traced back to the early days of policing. It is a serious problem within most police forces today, as it is widely know that is it something that is not only hard to calculate, but also hard to reduce and near impossible to eradicate. The following will explore what corruption is defined as and reasons for why police corruption occurs. Continue Reading…


The Police and Criminal Evidence Acts 1984-Provides an Effective Balance Between the Powers of the Police and Safe Guards Provided for Suspects

One of the fundamental civil liberties is the right to freedom of your person from detention, and your property from seizure, without lawful cause. Recognition if this right goes back centuries in the history of Britain. Its fundamental expression is in the statement that we live in a country where one of the basic principles of the constitution is that our affairs shall be carried on under “the rule of law”. In Entick v Carrington (1765) 19 St Tr 1030 Lord Chief Justice Camden set out the basic principle that anyone who invades another’s private property is guilty of an offence unless they can show a justification for having done so.  Continue Reading…


Ethics and Police Corruption

Abstract

By nature, police work entails dealing with issues that can result in corruption. In turn, involvement in corruption leads to the problem of ethics and morality. What are the practices of police work that are deemed as corrupt? And how are they unethical or immoral? Is police corruption an administrative or ethical issue? Police corruption involves corruption of authority, kickbacks, opportunistic theft, shakedown, protection of illegal activities, direct criminal activities, payoffs, flaking, padding, etc. Continue Reading…


Police Corruption and Police Deviant Behavior in America

Police deviance and corruption are problems that affect everybody. As citizens, everyone trusts and gives the police the power to enforce the law in order to protect the rights and liberties of the people; the implications of these powers are taking away somebody’s liberties that has broken or believed to have broken the law. There is a fine line that divides the liberties and rights from the law and obligations of each citizen of the United States. Continue Reading…


Use Of Force and The Media

Making a Problem of Brutality

Crime is a problem that preoccupies the news and the public. As the nation has engaged in “wars” on crime and drugs over the past several decades, crime has become an ever-more prevalent staple of news reporting. A variety of studies of media content have estimated that as much as 25 percent of the daily news is devoted to crime and that crime is the largest major category of stories in the print and electronic media.

As with other kinds of news, the most privileged perspectives in most crime stories are those offered by officials, particularly the police. In fact, media interest in “crime waves” can be the product, at least in part, of official efforts to create, sustain, or exploit public concern about crime. Privileged access to the media offers police and other official’s abundant opportunities to shape public images of themselves, their work, and the nature of the crime problem.

Continue Reading…


Police Brutality

Introduction

The police force is an arm of the criminal justice system. One of their functions is to help in the maintenance of peace and order within the community. Some patrol the streets for the purpose of achieving high police visibility while some stay in the police department to respond to calls for assistance coming from the locals of a community. In case a crime is committed in their presence or when responding to calls for assistance, their task is to apprehend these criminals.

The Police Officers may also be deployed in cases of mass demonstrations. In democratic countries the people air their grievances by conducting mass rallies and demonstrations after they have secured the necessary clearances from the government. The function of the police officers deployed to places where mass demonstrations are being held is to ensure that the people stay within the area covered by their permit. They also seek to ensure that people do not commit any criminal acts or disturb the peace and order of the city. In case the demonstrators commit any violations the task of police officers is to apprehend them.

Continue Reading…